Land Use Law Report

 
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |

Searched Library for year - 2012
 

Land Use Law Report, Annual Index, February 2013


Land Use Law Report, Volume 40, Number 12, December 2012

Easement: Govt.'s Interim-Trail-Use Notice Triggers Rails-To-Trails Taking
Environmental: Threat To Consent Decree Funding Doesn't Warrant Federal Jurisdiction
Preservation: Oregon Statute Does Not Preempt City's Stricter Vegetation Requirements
Preemption: Mobile Home Conversion Procedure Doesn't 'Repeal' Other California Permit Schemes

Land Use Law Report, Number 11, November 2012

Takings: U.S. Supreme Court Considers Takings In Koontz
Historic Preservation: Charleston's Height-Raising Ordinance In Historic District Wasn't Unlawful Sp
Easement: Kansas Prescriptive Easements Require A Claimant's Exclusive Use
Environmental: Government Must Mitigate GMO Effects In Wildlife Refuges

Land Use Law Report, Number 10, October 2012

Mining: The Terms 'Reassign' And 'Reconveyance' Show Intent To Revert Property To Grantor
Taking: 'Invasive' Flood Of Raw Sewage Can Be A Taking
Sovereign Immunity: Katrina Litigation Can't Touch Corps
Historic Preservation: Conservation Group Lacked Standing To Challenge Historic Site's De-Listing

Land Use Law Report, Number 9, September 2012

Telecommunication: Town Couldn't Deny Cell Tower Based On Unsubstantiated Opinion
Zoning: City Ordinance Limiting Billboards To "Harmonious Use" Too Vague
Zoning: Court Reverses $3.6 Million Award To Landowners Who Lost Out On Sale To Wal-Mart
Environmental: 'Dirty Water' Challenge To Industrial Chicken Farm Fails

Land Use Law Report, Number 8, August 2012

Takings: 'Futility Exception' Fails Where Expected Permit Denial Is Based On Conflict Over A Separat
Inverse Condemnation: No Right To Continue Landfill Use When Owner Ceased Use Voluntarily
Utilities/Environmental: Hydropower Projects Can Be Authorized Under Any Nationwide 404 Permit
Inverse Condemnation: Owners Had No Investment-Backed Expectations Where They Shouldered No Risk

Land Use Law Report, Number 7, July 2012

Development: Continuing Moratorium Was Reasonable Way To Limit Development During Appeal
Condemnation: No Inverse Condemnation When Easement And Flooding Are Merely Anticipated
Environment: Agency Relied On Wishful Thinking, Rather Than An EIS, To Address Impact
Historic Preservation: Mere Existence Of Buildings Pending Appeal Cannot Support Continuing Violatio

Land Use Law Report, Number 6, June 2012

Zoning: Business Owners Have Property Interests In Their Business Permits
Easement: Conservation Easement Forbids Owners From Filling Sinkhole
Environment & Historic Preservation: Site-Specific Standing Required To Challenge DOT Act Violat
Trespass: Government May Win Double Damages Following Forest Fire

Land Use Law Report, Number 5, May 2012

Zoning: No Futile Special Use Permit Application Necessary For RLUIPA Complaint
Environment: The Forest Service--Not Ranchers--May Have Wreaked Habitat Damage
Housing: City That Controls Private Subsidized Apartments Must Meet Due Process Requirements
Regulatory Taking -- Historical Preservation: Rejection Of 'Grandiose' Condo Complex Doesn't Preclud

Land Use Law Report, Number 4, April 2012

Easement: Public Easement Is A Right-Of-Way
Environmental: Idaho May Have To Curtail Mega-Loads Clogging A Scenic Highway
Preemption: Local Laws Govern Site Of Natural Gas Facility
Nuisance: Beach Cottages Pose Safety Risk

Land Use Law Report, Number 3, March 2012

Special Issue:rluipa's Substantial Burdens
Use Permit: 'Leapfrog Development' Defense Fails To Hurdle Imposition Of Substantial Burdens
Zoning Law: A Zoning Reg Can Be The Basis Of An RLUIPA Claim
Special Permit: Zoning Board's Arbitrary Rejection Prompts Substantial Burden Finding
Use Agreement: Inconvenience Is Not A Substantial Burden To Religion

Land Use Law Report, Number 2, February 2012

Inverse Condemnation: Development Delay Leads To Impermissible Spot oning
Environmental: One Project's Economic Advantage To Another Does Not Make A NEPA 'Connected' Action
Environmental: Deregulation Of Genetically Modified Crop Did Not Violate Plant Protection Act
Taking: 'Hope' Of A Mitigation Bank Permit Is Not A Compensable Property Interest

Land Use Law Report, Number 1, January 2012

Historic Preservation: Loss Of Architecturally Significant Buildings Negatively Impacts Neighborhood
Taking: Replenished Beach Belongs To State, Not Beachfront Owner
Taking: 'Just Compensation' State Statute Did Not Violate Substantive Due Process
Telecommunications: 'It's An Eyesore' Cell Tower Objection Must Be Accompanied By Expert Analysis

×

Dear Valued Customers,

We regret to announce that ProEdTech LLC and all its affiliate brands will cease operations on April 1, 2019.

We are no longer able to fulfill online orders. We will fullfill all DVD and book orders already placed.

Customers of canceled webinars and subscription products may request a refund at (800) 223-8720 or service@proedtech.com. You must do so by April 1, 2019.

Thank you for your business and loyalty over the years. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused.


Best regards,
The ProEdTech Team